Aligned with the standards
your institution already trusts.

WriteSpan is not self-certified. Every dimension of the platform — its rubric, its scoring process, its treatment of student language — is grounded in the professional standards that govern writing assessment in American higher education.

The WPA Outcomes Statement defines what students should know and be able to do as a result of first-year composition instruction. WriteSpan's six-dimension rubric is directly aligned with the WPA Outcomes across four domains: Rhetorical Knowledge, Critical Thinking and Reading and Composing, Processes, and Knowledge of Conventions.

The CCCC Writing Assessment Position Statement establishes that valid writing assessment requires human judgment and must be sensitive to local context, purpose, and the diversity of student writers. WriteSpan is built around this principle: no essay is finalized without human reviewer confirmation, and the platform explicitly rejects automated scoring as a substitute for trained human evaluation.

The CCCC Students' Right to Their Own Language affirms that students have the right to their own patterns and varieties of language — the dialects of their communities and the idiolects of their culture. WriteSpan's Dimension 6 (Conventions) is explicitly SRTOL-aligned: dialect features, code-switching, and non-dominant language patterns are never penalized. Reviewers are trained to distinguish between unintentional surface errors and intentional or culturally grounded language use.

The ACRL Framework defines information literacy as a set of interconnected core concepts rather than a checklist of skills. WriteSpan's Dimension 4 (Source Engagement) is aligned with the ACRL Framework's emphasis on students engaging sources as participants in ongoing scholarly conversations rather than as authorities to be cited or decorations to be included.